This week for Divine Feminine Friday: Creating From The Shadows we continue our exploration of women whose creative brilliance was suppressed, redirected, or quietly absorbed into the legacy of others. These are the stories not just of erasure, but of proximity to greatness—where the spark was struck, but the credit never landed where it began. The second theme of patriarchal subjugation, The Stolen Flame, brings us to those whose work lit the path for others but who were left in the shadows holding the match.
Today, we examine a woman whose intellect shaped a threshold in modern science, yet whose name remains a point of dispute. Was she a co-creator, a silent contributor, or something deeper—one who knew what could not yet be spoken, and chose not to step into the light?
As we compare her to the Norse archetype of the Seeress who reveals truth without claiming power, we invite you to investigate what history has not fully proven. Her letters remain. Her absence is marked. Her flame, we suspect, still burns beneath the surface.
Get your notebooks ready.
The Hidden Root
“I remember nine worlds, nine giant women… the mighty tree growing beneath the earth.”1
Standing at the edge of the known, staff in hand, her memory reaches backward through blood and stone. The air thickens when she speaks, for what she offers is a different kind of clarity, in the form of code. She does not shout her knowledge. In circling it, her voice twists like smoke around a fire—only saying enough to be remembered, while withholding enough to be doubted.2
This is the Völva, the ancient prophetess of the North, who rules not from throne nor hall. She travels alone, only summoned in times of upheaval. When she appears, it is not to command, but to interpret the trembling of the world. Her wisdoms come from vision, not victory. She sees pattern behind the pattern, knowing which thread will snap before it frays.3
She first enters our record in the Völuspá, the opening poem of the Poetic Edda, where Odin himself raises her from the dead to demand prophecy. From the depths of memory, she chants the origin of all things—the birth of worlds, the turning of gods, the secrets of what is to come. Her voice is not loud, but irreversible. The gods listen. The poem ends not with triumph, but transformation. Even Odin must bow to what she knows.4
In life, the völur were real women—practitioners of seiðr, a form of Norse magic and knowledge. They traveled the Iron Age and Viking world by invitation or necessity, carrying staffs carved with runes, cloaked in blue or black. Villagers brought them offerings. Leaders consulted them before war. They were feared not for what they did, but for what they knew.5 Their practice was neither science nor superstition, but something deeper: A form of unmeasurable seeing unable to be ignored.
Presenting the rhythm of the unseen, the gifts of these women were not always welcomed. Even Odin, the All-Father, was mocked for learning seiðr from the goddess Freyja—its femininity considered unbecoming of a god.6 To know what the world is made of without owning it, to move within systems without ruling them? This was the power of the Völva. For this, she was revered, exiled, or erased. To many, she is considered dangerous; to some, sacred. For those who write history, she is often forgotten or made nameless… or called mad.
There are women whose brilliance is not written, instead woven into the thinking of men, the formulation of theories, the shape of equations and the architecture of a turning century. These women are not cited in journals or lectures. They are summoned in moments of genius, their labor absorbed into the legacy of another.
They leave no final papers, only echoes. They speak once, then disappear. Yet if you listen closely enough, you may still hear the hum of what passed through them first.
The woman we turn to next does not appear in history as its author, though she shaped its line. She worked in shadow, speaking into the pattern. She knew what was coming long before the world was ready to understand it.
Threshold of Discovery
This could be the story of Mileva Marić. More accurately, it is the story of the signs of a summons she left behind.
Because it is not she who stood at the podium or wrote the formula for public view. She is the one who understood the structure. Her tools were calculation, correction and unspoken fluency. Like the Völva, she knew what could not yet be named and was forced to live within the margins—of papers, of marriage, of memory. Never making declarations, Mileva merely left behind fragments, letters, glimpses, echoes.
Rather than follow a timeline, to trace her is to step into a ritual circle. In what follows do not expect proof. Our effort to understand her contribution is at best, prophecy. Evidence will be offered in pieces, as it arrived: Phrases sent by hand, unacknowledged formulas, silences surrounding a name.
Read carefully, for the future has already passed through her hands.
The Initiation
She is born in 1875, in Titel, a provincial town along the banks of the Danube, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The land is a crossroads of empires, religions, and uprisings. Serbia simmers with the memory of Ottoman rule and the hunger for sovereignty. To be born a girl here is to inherit not promise but parameters.7
Yet in Mileva’s family, there is a crack in the wall. Her father, Miloš Marić, a civil servant and former military officer, is a man of ambition for both himself, and his daughter. He uses his position to obtain rare permissions, opening doors barred to most girls. He moves the family to Novi Sad, then Zagreb, seeking better schools. Where others teach their daughters to obey, Miloš teaches his to solve. Her mother, Marija Ružić Marić, comes from a modest Serbian Orthodox family and is known for her reserve and discipline. Though less formally educated, she brings structure to the home and supports Mileva’s schooling with quiet constancy. Between the two parents, Mileva is given both access and expectation—a rare combination for a girl in her time.8
By age eleven, Mileva is fluent in German and Serbian. By sixteen, she is studying physics in an all-male class at the Royal Classical Gymnasium. Her teachers note her precision, her austerity, her genius. She is small, severe and meticulous. One of them writes she is “a rare mind.” Another warns she will have trouble marrying.9
In 1896, she crosses yet another threshold—this time into the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zurich, one of the only universities in Europe open to women in physics. She is the only woman in her section. Her name appears beside five men. One of them is Albert Einstein. They begin as classmates, then become co-readers. Soon, they are co-conspirators in the logic of the universe. He is exuberant, brilliant, undisciplined. She is rigorous, restrained, exacting. They share notebooks, walks, calculations, questions. She sharpens him. He excites her.10
During term, they are nearly inseparable, studying late into the night, then discussing theory the next morning over coffee and chalkboards. Yet between school years, Mileva returns to Novi Sad or visits friends and family in Serbia. Albert stays behind or travels elsewhere in Switzerland. These separations give rise to their letters, written across borders and seasons, filled with equations, confessions and dreams of discovery. In these exchanges, their intimacy grows as much intellectually as romantically. The physics is not flirtation. It offers partnership. Einstein speaks often of our work, our theory, our research. In these early years, it is not always easy to separate his thinking from hers, nor does he always try.11
Yet while he ascends, she stumbles. In 1900, she fails her final exam. The mathematics which is her strength—somehow betrays her. Or might it be because she is already pregnant? They are not yet married. In a world governed by precision, she becomes a problem without a solution. She does not receive her diploma, never to return to the university.12
The Circle of Fire
Then came those mighty ones,
those who shaped the world,
great Midgard’s builders;
and sun, moon, stars
they placed in their courses
to light the heavens.13
The world does not change in a burst of light. It begins in a quiet room. A child cries in the next chamber. The snow melts on the roof of a modest flat. The pen scratches against paper, refiguring the laws of time.
In Bern, Mileva Marić tends to her firstborn son, Hans Albert, while Albert Einstein works at the Swiss Patent Office. They live as many do, by modest means, with secondhand furniture and a stove needing to be coaxed through winter. He works six days a week reviewing technical submissions. She keeps house. What remains of her formal education is not lost, only uninvited.
When the workday ends, their apartment becomes a site of inquiry. Physics problems are discussed over evening meals. A blackboard leans against the wall. Mileva prepares notes, calculates, listens. Together they read Henri Poincaré and Ludwig Boltzmann, two of the most influential scientific thinkers of their time. Poincaré, a French mathematician and physicist, questioning the absolutes of space and time and laying early groundwork for relativity with his writings on simultaneity and the limits of classical mechanics. Boltzmann, an Austrian physicist, advances the field of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, introducing probabilistic models challenging deterministic views of the universe. These are not casual readings. The ideas are dense, controversial, and difficult to reconcile. For Mileva and Albert, these texts become shared terrain, intellectual ground from which new questions emerge and new frameworks take shape.
They continue what began in Zurich, though now it is less sanctioned, more private. The Olympia Academy, a reading group formed by Einstein and two friends, meets in their home. These sessions explore philosophy, science and literature, but the work soon to define the new century takes shape outside those hours. Genius lives at the kitchen table, on the margins, and in the space between interruption and concentration.
In 1905, Albert Einstein submits five papers soon to change physics. Among them are the photoelectric effect, Brownian motion, mass-energy equivalence, and the special theory of relativity. It is known as the ‘Miracle Year’ of Einstein’s career, yet not a single one of the works bears Mileva’s name. Their ground is shaky as their son is barely a year old. The family has no formal support. There is only the apartment and a second child on the way to add more burden. Then there is this early swell of transformative information which no one outside their circle yet understands, and certainly won’t pay the bills. At least, not yet.
Mileva’s presence during this period is neither publicly documented nor publicly acknowledged. Somehow, in many of the surviving letters from these earlier years, Einstein continues to refer to our theory, our work, our investigation always speaking in the plural. What remains unclear is whether this language reflects intellectual partnership, emotional intimacy, or the flirtatious vocabulary of youth. The notebooks they once shared are missing. The draft manuscripts do not survive. Rumors of a joint signature on the works, “Einstein-Marić,” cannot be verified. To interpret her role is to have read what is not written.14
She sat on the hill, saw far and wide
over all the worlds:
She saw Valkyries coming
from afar, ready to ride.15
Similarly, the Völva does not appear to take credit. She only appears when something must be seen from outside its motion, listening as others form their strategies. As she names what is coming, she will never command the path. Her work is not authorship, it is interpretation, presence and the weight of knowing. In the poems, Völva is not remembered for what she changes, but for what she sees, and the deafening silence to follow once her vision has been spoken.
In the circle of fire surrounding this Annus Mirabilis, Mileva is neither co-author nor witness. She is within the fire, working without attribution. She holds the anvil steady, living beside the papers destined to redefine reality, yet her role is neither footnoted nor reclaimed in the moment. Whether she actually shapes the content directly or only secures the space in which it can take shape, the pattern is clear: She is written out.16
Not absent, nor passive. Only unseen.
For this is not the story of a collaborator who failed to demand credit. Instead, it is the story of a woman who recognized who and what she was standing beside. Mileva carried forward the continuity without concern for her claim. She held the structure, giving it the room it needed to take form.
Now I see Earth rise a second time
out of the waters, green once more.17
Her presence, like the Völva, is never meant to be applauded. Rather, it should be felt in the architecture that followed. What was born in the apartment in Bern cannot be understood by equations alone. It must be understood by tracing the space around the equation along with the voice which helped it take form, then fell silent.
The Silence Clause
I sat outside alone when the Old One came.
He looked into my eyes:
‘What more do you know? What more will you say?’18
By 1910, the correspondence between Mileva Marić and Albert Einstein has changed in tone. What once opened with calculations and shared enthusiasm for the structure of space now opens with illness, tension and fatigue. Their second son, Eduard, is born. His early brilliance will later be marked by emotional collapse. Mileva begins to bear the full weight of a private world held together with too few supports as she is basically abandoned by her husband.19
In 1912, Einstein accepts a professorship in Prague, then Zurich. The family moves. Mileva, once again in the orbit of academia, no longer enters it. Her role becomes narrower, her voice as referenced in any archives, fainter. By 1914, Einstein relocates to Berlin while Mileva remains in Zurich with the children. The marriage deteriorates. Letters reveal a list of terms Einstein offers her for remaining in the household. Among them: She must ensure his clothes are kept in order, he is not disturbed in his study, and she must “renounce all personal relations with [him], insofar as they are not completely necessary for social reasons.” She refuses.20
They separate that year.
The divorce is not finalized until 1919. In the agreement, Einstein includes a clause offering her the monetary award from the Nobel Prize, should he win it. He receives the prize in 1922, for the photoelectric effect. The money is given to Mileva and placed in trust for her and their sons.21
This clause has been studied, quoted and interpreted in many directions. Some scholars view it as financial compensation for her years of support. Others suggest it may signal a quiet recognition of her intellectual contributions. Einstein himself never explains it. She never comments on it.
She remembers ancient wars,
the clash of gods, the ash of empires.
She does not lift her voice.
She lifts the veil.22
Mileva does not publish and never speaks publicly. She does not dispute the theories emerging from the years they shared. Instead, she devotes her life to her sons. As Eduard’s mental health declines in the 1930s it is necessary for him to be institutionalized. Mileva’s world becomes very simple: She visits him regularly, pays his bills, writes letters on his behalf. She will do this for the rest of her life.
In Zurich, Mileva continues to live in modest apartments, often within sight of the very university once marking the height of her promise. She gives private lessons in mathematics, keeping her distance from press inquiries and public speculation. Her dignity never falters. She will not recant her life, nor will she revise it.23
The Völva, in the final verses of Völuspá, is asked by Odin what more she knows. She speaks once more, then falls silent. Once her vision has been given, her task is finished. She returns to the earth—not remembered as triumphant, but remembered as necessary.24
Mileva Marić’s legacy has often been defined by what she failed to do: Claim credit, defend herself, demand recognition. Yet this framing assumes she did not know what was coming. It assumes she was surprised by her exclusion. What if she saw it before anyone else? What if her silence was not erasure, but foresight?
To live inside the shaping of a world, then step away from its rewards, is not weakness. It shows another kind of strength, one much more difficult to name.
The Return to the Tree
I see Earth rise a second time
out of the waters, green once more.
Forth from the waterfall,
an eagle flies above the mountain,
and over it, the sun.25
Mileva Marić dies in 1948, at the age of seventy-two. The world into which she was born—crowned by empires, governed by men, restricted by law—has broken open. The war has ended, nations have fallen. The equations she once lived beside are now printed in textbooks. Not once does her name appear beside them.
Buried in Zürich, her grave remained unmarked for many years. Her son Eduard, who never left the institution, ends up surviving her by seventeen more. When he dies, there is no one in their circle of family left to receive his ashes. The state disperses them.26
History passes by quietly, yet the pattern shifts. In the decades to follow, her name begins to return. Letters are recovered and biographies appear. Scholars revisit the early years in Zurich and Bern, looking again at the partnership. Feminist historians ask new questions, not only about authorship, but about the systems which decide who is allowed to speak, and who is remembered.27
No longer described as a failed student or tragic wife, Mileva Marić is studied as a figure of substance. Not because she stood at the center of a revolution, but because she stood just outside it, shaping the space in which it became possible.
The Völva does not disappear.
She becomes root.
She becomes rhythm.
She is what holds the weight of the world.28
To say Marić was a contributor, or a collaborator, is simply not enough. Reducing her to a hidden ‘other’ half is also incomplete. What she carried may not have been a signature; it was structure, integrity of thought, containment of chaos. She knew how and when to hold complexity. More importantly, she knew when to step back from it. She does not appear here to be corrected into history. She needs to be read in the same way the Völva was read: Through pattern, silence, memory and the curve of what was held—even though never claimed.
The world Mileva helped to shape did not make room for her. Yet it was her presence, her seeing, and her withdrawal which allowed it to form. There is no final line to her story. Only cyclical return. Like the roots of Yggdrasil,29 she remains unseen, yet without her, the whole structure begins to decay. She will no longer be silent for she has been made part of the system again—reclaimed not by monument, but by recognition.
She gave her gift once. Now, ours is to give her back her place.
For Divine Feminine Friday, we offer this portrait not as conclusion but as invocation. In the spirit of Creating From The Shadows, we have followed the signs of a woman whose flame was never extinguished, only hidden, and whose presence shaped the foundations of modern thought while history looked the other way. What she carries with her is something far older: The power to see what cannot yet be spoken, giving it form in her silence. Honoring the stolen flame of a woman creating in the shadows who has not spoken on record, yet has already shaped the equation—we leave the rest, as the Völva would, for you to discern.
Our Thumbnail image comes from a biographical article questioning Mileva Marić’s contribution to Einstein’s work and is unfortunately not credited. I will update this if I find its attribution.
Creating From The Shadows series:
Introduction: A Public Reckoning with Silenced Genius
Part I: The Bronte Sisters
Part II: George Sand
Part III: Louisa May Alcott
Part IV: Hilma af Klint
Part V: Sophia Taeuber-Arp
If you have enjoyed this post for Divine Feminine Friday consider fueling my next!
Bibliography—
Fölsing, Albrecht. Albert Einstein: A Biography. Translated by Ewald Osers. New York: Viking, 1997.
Isaacson, Walter. Einstein: His Life and Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007.
Jochens, Jenny. Old Norse Images of Women. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996.
Larrington, Carolyne, trans. The Poetic Edda. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Lindow, John. Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Milentijević, Radmila. Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein. New York: BookSurge, 2015.
Orchard, Andy. Cassell’s Dictionary of Norse Myth and Legend. London: Cassell, 1997.
Price, Neil. The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019.
Snorri Sturluson. The Prose Edda. Translated by Jesse L. Byock. London: Penguin Classics, 2005.
Stachel, John, David C. Cassidy, Jürgen Renn, and Robert Schulmann, eds. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 1: The Early Years, 1879–1902. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.
Troemel-Ploetz, Senta. “Mileva Einstein-Marić: The Woman Who Did Einstein’s Mathematics.” Women’s Studies International Forum 13, no. 5 (1990): 415–432.
Walker, Evan Harris. “Did Einstein Espouse his Spouse’s Ideas?” Physics Today 43, no. 2 (1990): 9–11.
The Poetic Edda: Volume II – The Heroic Poems, translated by Carolyne Larrington (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanza 2.
Neil Price, The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019), 235–276; and Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanzas 1–3.
Neil Price, The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019), 240–258; Andy Orchard, Cassell’s Dictionary of Norse Myth and Legend (London: Cassell, 1997), 422–425.
Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanzas 1–66; John Lindow, Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 307–309.
Neil Price, The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019), 243–260; Jenny Jochens, Old Norse Images of Women (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996), 114–119.
Snorri Sturluson, The Prose Edda, trans. Jesse L. Byock (London: Penguin Classics, 2005), 35–36.
Radmila Milentijević, Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein (New York: BookSurge, 2015), 1–3; Dejan Djokić, A Concise History of Serbia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023), 105–112.
Radmila Milentijević, Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein (New York: BookSurge, 2015), 4–7.
Ibid., 10–13.
Radmila Milentijević, Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein (New York: BookSurge, 2015), 18–23; John Stachel et al., eds., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 1: The Early Years, 1879–1902 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 230–235.
John Stachel et al., eds., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 1: The Early Years, 1879–1902 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 274–289; Evan Harris Walker, “Did Einstein Espouse his Spouse’s Ideas?” Physics Today 43, no. 2 (1990): 9–11.
Radmila Milentijević, Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein (New York: BookSurge, 2015), 33–36
Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanza 5.
John Stachel et al., eds., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 1: The Early Years, 1879–1902 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 274–289; Evan Harris Walker, “Did Einstein Espouse his Spouse’s Ideas?” Physics Today 43, no. 2 (1990): 9–11; Senta Troemel-Ploetz, “Mileva Einstein-Marić: The Woman Who Did Einstein’s Mathematics,” Women’s Studies International Forum 13, no. 5 (1990): 415–432.
Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanza 30.
Evan Harris Walker, “Did Einstein Espouse his Spouse’s Ideas?” Physics Today 43, no. 2 (1990): 9–11; Senta Troemel-Ploetz, “Mileva Einstein-Marić: The Woman Who Did Einstein’s Mathematics,” Women’s Studies International Forum13, no. 5 (1990): 415–432.
Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanza 59.
Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanza 28.
Walter Isaacson, Einstein: His Life and Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007), 175–180.
Walter Isaacson, Einstein: His Life and Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007), 167–170; Albrecht Fölsing, Albert Einstein: A Biography, trans. Ewald Osers (New York: Viking, 1997), 356–358.
Ibid., 112–115.
Adapted from themes in Völuspá, in Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), stanzas 20–30; see also Neil Price, The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019), 240–258.
Radmila Milentijević, Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein (New York: BookSurge, 2015), 140–146.
Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanzas 66–67.
Ibid., stanza 59.
Radmila Milentijević, Mileva Marić Einstein: Life with Albert Einstein (New York: BookSurge, 2015), 147–152.
Senta Troemel-Ploetz, “Mileva Einstein-Marić: The Woman Who Did Einstein’s Mathematics,” Women’s Studies International Forum 13, no. 5 (1990): 415–432; Evan Harris Walker, “Did Einstein Espouse his Spouse’s Ideas?” Physics Today 43, no. 2 (1990): 9–11.
Based upon Neil Price, The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019), 255–260; and Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, concluding stanzas 60–66.
Yggdrasil is the cosmic tree connecting all realms of existence and anchoring fate—a central symbol in Norse cosmology, often associated with the reach and depth of knowledge. Carolyne Larrington, trans., The Poetic Edda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Völuspá, stanzas 19–20; John Lindow, Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 202–204.